The candidate?

Milan Skarka

Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, the author of the Contract with America (1994), a professor of history and a life-long politician is perhaps a man of the hour now. His very abrasive and combative style of debate is laden with multiple ideas and options along with historically referenced content. Perhaps this could be the reason that he caught fire on his ascendancy to become a Republican Presidential candidate. In the political season defined by the news media markets, performing well in a debate on television is crucial to success. Newt is a master of this art and the electorate, tired of bland and almost disinterested, teleprompter dependent Obama is taking a close look at him. It should be an interesting competition of ideas. Both have some issues to be resolved and both are in it to the end.

If Newt gets the nomination it would be thanks to Obama; just like Jimmy Carter made Reagan’s nomination feasible, albeit he was thought by liberals and RINOs (Republican-In-Name-Only) to be the quintessential “Dunce” and unelectable. This may reflect the times and economies on the brink or perhaps the desire of the people wanting to make hard change in the direction of the Country of the ever increasing governmental controls and out of control deficit spending. In any case, I see the fork in the road and it isn’t Yogi Berra’s fork. The next election would be similar to the 1980’s election, only with more serious and lasting consequences. As the Viennese used to say during the heydays of the Austrian Empire: things are hopeless but not serious.

Oh’ yes, Newt Gingrich will be reviled by many. However, he may be the only candidate able to put Barack Hussein Obama in his place swiftly, without reservations and for all to see. And yes, unfortunately there are still too many that have yet to see the harm BHO has done to this great Country. Obama’s campaign is on target to raise a billion dollars for the 2012 election cycle. It is a treasure chest of the great divide, a class warfare and negative activity since he has nothing to show for what many consider “positive achievement”. His [their] “ideas” are right out of the Saul Alinsky/Marx playbook. During the Russian revolution of 1917, the Bolsheviks hoped for things to get really bad because this was the only way their ideas would be accepted by the people. Are the similarities here purely coincidental?

Unless the American people turn out all the crooks and charlatans, whether Republican or Democrat currently in office at every level of government, from the national to the municipal, and replace them with legislators and executives who value limited government and a free-market economy, things will only get worse. Indeed, there may even be a world-wide economic collapse on the order of the Great Depression. Of course, just as has been the case with the Great Depression, only a tiny minority will understand the true cause and the correct cure. As usual, false conclusions will be drawn from the experience, and we will set ourselves up for another collapse in the future even as we slowly recover from this one.

The BHO’s campaign song for now is: The Thrill is Gone by B.B. King.

From our Washington correspondent


About Avadoro Worden

This entry was posted in America, Corruption, Socialism and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to The candidate?

  1. rosencrantz says:

    Mark Steyn also talks about Gingrich:
    “…my main gripe with Newt derives from an appearance he made in New Hampshire just at the lowest, darkest depths of the Iraq war, just after Iraq had been given self government, and the new elected government and prime minister had emerged. And the Republicans were doing badly, and someone in the crowd asked Newt why the Republicans were doing such a bad job in Washington. And he said well, you must understand, we’re not used to being in the majority. Now at that point, the Republicans had been in the majority for ten years. The Iraqis are supposed to pick up the hang, pick up the knack of government in six months, but the Republican Party apparently can’t get the hang of it after ten years. And I thought Newt sounded pathetic. And it exemplified the problem to me, I think. He has many brilliant qualities, but he was not an effective executive.”

    The whole interview here

  2. Milan Skarka says:

    Agreed. However, as the saying goes: it takes a thief to catch a thief, so it maybe possible (just maybe) that Newt can beat Obama and bring in the Republican Senate. Since he is well known in Congress and has his share of “enemies” there – they maybe able to control Newt’s mischievous desires and tendencies. This is only a hope, however, since there is no real Reagan-like conservative candidate on the horizon. Ron Paul is the only true “small-government” constitutional candidate for whom the majority of people are not ready yet.

  3. Taurus says:

    I wish you were right, Milan. But if the America’s Right can’t produce anything better than Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Ron Paul, then all I can say is – God save America, for she is no longer blessed. And for a sample of Ron Paul’s wisdom – Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul said Thursday evening that Bush administration officials were gleeful after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks because it gave them a pretext to invade Iraq. “Just think of what happened after 9/11. Immediately before there was any assessment there was glee in the administration because now we can invade Iraq,” the Texas Republican told a group of mostly young backers in Iowa. He went on to suggest officials are now setting the stage for an invasion of Iran.

  4. Milan says:

    Point well taken, however, in my estimation there is a political current developing that exists outside the two-party politics. The two political parties-essentially one big government party-are fast loosing credibility and mainly support by public in general. Latest polls show the Congress to have only 9% approval and registered partisans are diminishing fast. This may take a couple of political cycles to manifest it. If Obama wins reelection the process will be accelerated due to the collapse of economy and following popular unrest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>