Joys of conspiracies in Queensland

…from the quill of Antisthenes the Younger

From time to time, everybody should relax and enjoy a really good conspiracy theory just as Americans do. In all the mindless entertainment, United States of America, for better or worse, leads the herd. Perhaps it has got something to do with the Protestant work ethic being slowly displaced by the trade unions’ apres deluge approach to that disagreeable time waster formerly called work.

It pains me that at this stage I have emphasise that ‘conspiracy’ and ‘conspiracy theory’ are not the same. Many otherwise educated people, including prosecutors, fiscals and US State attorneys do not know the difference.

A conspiracy to commit a crime is usually defined as follows (Queensland Criminal Code version):- Any person who conspires with another to commit any crime, or to do any act in any part of the world which if done in Queensland would be a crime, and which is an offence under the laws in force in the place where it is proposed to be done, is guilty of a crime, and is liable, if no other punishment is provided, to imprisonment with hard labour for seven years…

The New York State Penal Code, naturally, complicates the matters (after all, they have more lawyers to feed) this way:-

105.15 Conspiracy in the second degree. A person is guilty of conspiracy in the second degree when, with intend that conduct constituting a class A felony be performed, he agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of such conduct.

In New York you have a choice of conspiracies from the first degree up to the sixth, on the last reading, though in practical terms the difference is only in the severity of the slap on the wrist.

But those real life things are not funny, or at least not as amusing as honest to goodness conspiracy theories, where anything goes and no logic, not to mention evidence, is needed. Sometimes, however, some intrepid follower of no or twisted logic finds the evidence and a conspiracy theory morphs into a conspiracy. By that time of course the culprits are safely dead anyway and all that remains is for a few books to be written and a few hands to be wrung. But most of the time no evidence is found and, if it is, it is buried in the morass of other, conflicting conspiracy theories; some of which are put forward by the genuine conspirators.

As you may or may not know Marcus Brutus was nowhere near Julius Caesar when the latter committed suicide on the Ides of March. History ignored Brutus’ rotunda-stone-clad alibi. Suetonius, Plutarch and Shakespeare were all on the conspiracy. “Et tu, Brutus?” is a fabrication equal to anything Bob Brown never said.

In 1981 the Australian journalist Wilfred Burchett conclusively proved that the Soviet Union’s murderous purges were the consequence of the deep and devious deception by CIA. Naive Joseph Stalin was duped by unscrupulous Allen Dulles. (W. Burchett, At the Barricades; Macmillan, Australia)

The J.F.Kennedy assassination is another fruitful area for cover-up. The famous Abraham Zapruder‘s 8 mm film was scripted by KGB and made in a few versions to be used according to the location and weather. Apparently when one checks it, one would find that the sun could not have been at that position at that time. One theory is that the gulag astronomers, working under and resenting the direction of KGB, wished to give us a hint. The original idea was that the film, the only film, would be shown so often that the witnesses would believe the flickering screen images and not their own eyes. Allegedly it did work and today some less than ethical legal firms use carefully scripted video reconstructions or computer simulations of accidents to ‘refresh’ witnesses’ memory.

Back home. Here is an example of how low opinion citizens have of their betters; and furthermore, how desperate some of them can be to devise a conspiracy theory to suit their anti-Labor prejudices. I simplify and restate it for those overseas and for those who only watch ALP television channels. If I heard it, a half of Brisbane must have. It goes something like this -

1. A government party (X), certain to lose the office, and looking to the future financing of its re-election campaign, commissions a report with clear specification, to wit one which, while exonerating individuals in the Government, throws ajar the door to litigation for damages suffered by numerous individuals because of the Government’s or Government’s authorities’ misfeasance, malfeasance or worse.

2. A legal firm in cohort with a champerty* litigation financier solicits potential clients among the public at large well beforehand; and engages in an unprecedented media blitz to establish its credentials as a “victims” firm and thus discourages any other legal firm without matching financial support.

3. The party X looses the elections as expected and the new government is faced with a large bill. The option is either to defend the class action and look mean vis a vis victims, or give in, pay up and face the wrath of the citizens who have to contribute to pay those citizens who elected not to insure. It is sure Loose/ Loose situation for the government and Win/Win for the lawyers, who collect 1/3 of the damages plus legal expenses, and do not go to jail in for this this taxpayers’ funded Monopoly.

5. Grateful lawyers freely donate 1/3 of their loot to the party X’s electoral fund.

6. The party X gets re-elected and following the electoral cycle based on voters’ amnesia, we get to the point 1. above. It is a Win for party X.

How could anybody in his right mind believe such a nonsense? But some will, and some might even try to find evidence for it.

 § § §

*/ champerty “ a form of maintenance in which a person maintaining takes as his reward a portion of anything which may be gained as a result of the proceedings. It is not champerty if the parties have a common interest, but a solicitor acting under such an agreement with his client may be guilty of champerty” used to be illegal, but for all I know it may be compulsory now. After all there is a common interest – to fleece the citizens.

About Antisthenes

A Greek philosopher, a pupil of Socrates. Led a revolt, with Diogenes, against the demands of the city-state and the sophistication of life. Accepted the interrelation of knowledge, virtue, and happiness; and sought the ideal condition for happiness in return to primitivism and self-sufficiency. Rejected all social distinctions as based on convention, scorned orthodox religion as a fabrication of lies, and studied early legends and animal life in order to arrive at a true understanding of natural law. The individual was free and self-sufficient when he was master of his passions, secure in his intelligence, impervious to social or religious demands, and satisfied with the poverty of a mendicant. Needless to say, a person who on the Fog of Chaos adopted the Athenian philosopher's name has nothing whatsoever in common with him.
This entry was posted in America, Australia, Conspiracy, History, Labour Party, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Joys of conspiracies in Queensland

  1. de messine says:

    Your conspiracy theory looks just as normal as many others I have read – and could be proven right one day. Keep us informed. I was curious if you get a lot of spam comments? If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can recommend? I get so much lately it is driving me mad so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  2. Brigitte says:

    I suppose we’ll see soon. I wouldn’t put it past them.

  3. Élias says:

    Your blog article is very interesting. The blog theme is unique and perfect, great job. To your success.btw – anything about that flood report?

  4. click-on says:

    Brilliant, thank you, I will visit again soon.

  5. Heather Bergevin says:

    You have provided some terrific information!

  6. Reginald says:

    Is it just a premonition or inside information, Antisthenes?

  7. free-line says:

    I really like what you guys are usually up to. Keep up the terrific works guys, I’ve added you guys to our blogroll.

  8. Tim says:

    Theft by any other name.

  9. Blorkbofi says:

    Seems that you are getting fleeced very nicely. Don’t you have newspapers down there?

  10. Pingback: Michael Carr

  11. Hower says:

    Outstanding outline there. What next?

  12. Day Tiper says:

    The matter develops as you predicted – not so hidden corruption in the banana state.

  13. Pingback: Bob Marr

  14. Minestroli says:

    Ethnic based mafias rule Queensland – there is nothing you can do about it.

  15. late but... says:

    Iím impressed, I have to admit. Rarely do I come across a blog that is both educative and entertaining, and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem of politico/legal ccorruption is something which not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about.

  16. Pingback: poe paso

  17. Pingback: laborite

  18. Gracie Lowdon says:

    Nothing changes in the state of Queensland – rot, rot everywhere.

  19. Longuimar says:

    Any news? Or is it forgotten in the corruption cauldron, formerly known as Queensland?

  20. Mimo Nower says:

    I am not sure where you are trying to get, but one day somebody will write a good book about Qld corruption.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>