Steadfast Obama

…from the quill of Antisthenes the Younger

President Obama does not allow any Muslims, peaceful or that minuscule handful of others, to dictate his agenda. When he plans to go to Las Vegas casinos to raise money for his re-election, he will go, regardless of how many American ambassadors they might have murdered in places he has never heard of. He bows to the dictators when he wants to; and apologises to the terrorists at the time and place of his choosing. Can Americans ask for a better, more American president?

Tired jokes aside, it is dispiriting that at the times of the impending existential trials of the Western civilisation we are stuck with the politicians, politicians in the worst meaning of that word, of the moral calibre of Beneš and Chamberlain of the pre-WW II Europe. Today there are no Churchills or at least De Gaulles anywhere on the horizon. We voted for Obamas, Camerons and Gillards and we and our children shall suffer the consequences.

Shortly though Americans will have a choice, of sorts, in November presidential elections. The contest seems to be tight and according to the punditeska, that part of American population, sequentially called niggers, negroes, blacks and now African-Americans (and each time made by the Left manipulators to be ashamed of the previous description) will vote uniformly for Hussein Obama. The Left’s so vaunted diversity obviously does not apply to diversity of thought.

In my limited personal experience the American blacks are patriotic, sometimes embarrassingly so, i.e. embarrassing to a classical cynic. Still, I was impressed. I never met the other kind like Angela Davis, Jeremiah Wright, Al Sharpton or Michelle Obama.

Slavish support en masse for the darkish skin colour, even if it belongs to the half-Kenyan, possibly related to Arab Muslim slave traders, does not put the US educational system in a favourable light. And, if indeed the blacks will so unthinkingly vote for Hussein Obama, regardless of his abysmal record, it could indicate a deeper problem, a problem the politically correct academia ignores. It is called racism.

About Antisthenes

A Greek philosopher, a pupil of Socrates. Led a revolt, with Diogenes, against the demands of the city-state and the sophistication of life. Accepted the interrelation of knowledge, virtue, and happiness; and sought the ideal condition for happiness in return to primitivism and self-sufficiency. Rejected all social distinctions as based on convention, scorned orthodox religion as a fabrication of lies, and studied early legends and animal life in order to arrive at a true understanding of natural law. The individual was free and self-sufficient when he was master of his passions, secure in his intelligence, impervious to social or religious demands, and satisfied with the poverty of a mendicant. Needless to say, a person who on the Fog of Chaos adopted the Athenian philosopher's name has nothing whatsoever in common with him.
This entry was posted in America, Election, Socialism and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Steadfast Obama

  1. Blackhat says:

    Pamela Geller has an important column at World Net Daily: OBAMA’S SHARIAH-INSPIRED WAR ON 1ST AMENDMENT

    This issue is far more important that what Romney said months ago about the 47 percent. It is far more important than what Obama said years ago about redistribution of income. We know Obama is a Marxist. What’s new?

    What’s new is that our First Amendment rights are under attack. Obama has sold us out and Romney isn’t saying a word. He must speak out.

    Geller writes that “…the riots have everything to do with America and U.S. policy. They are about freedom of conscience and freedom of speech: they’re an attempt to get the U.S. to shut down free speech and criminalize criticism of Islam, in accord with Shariah blasphemy laws. And the Obama administration is responding by putting a huge target on the head of the First Amendment (and on that of every U.S. citizen who exercises that constitutional right). This is a constitutional coup.”

    This is what we should be talking about. This is what Romney should be talking about.

    The latest “incident” is that a satirical Parisian weekly called Charlie Hedbo has published what the media call “crude caricatures” of the Prophet Muhammad. Once again, the Islamic fanatics have their underware in a twist. This magazine had its offices firebombed last year after it published an edition entitled “Sharia Hebdo” and described it as “guest edited” by the Prophet Mohammed.

    Today, its offices are surrounded by police, fearful of more violence against the publication.

    The AP says there is a “debate about the limits of free expression” that is underway around the world.

    That is what the Islamists want. I say to hell with the Islamists. We must stand up for freedom of speech.

  2. Ratioceli says:

    You have some honest ideas here. I’ve done a research on the issue and discovered most peoples will agree with your blog.

  3. Margorigue says:

    I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right.

  4. Proctor says:

    US people voted for a defeatist, probably Muslim and certainly socialist President. What can you expect? Freedom and prosperity?

  5. Downside says:

    If Mitt gets in, he won’t behave much better. Radical changes are needed.

  6. nonplused says:

    It looks like a real problem, and I can’t believe that Obama is that incompetent. It must be deliberate.

  7. Openstein says:

    Great article, I enjoyed reading it.

  8. Miumi says:

    Obama has the blood of our ambassador on his hands.

  9. Blorkbofi says:

    If I was an US voter, I would be ashamed of myself.

  10. puzzled says:

    Incredible story there. What happened after? Take care!

  11. Archbolio says:

    Fundamental problems is the education, then the media. Both have been in the Leftists’ hands for far too long. Result? Obama

  12. cheap bag says:

    We vote for crooks like that? Something wrong with this “democracy”.

  13. vip lash says:

    Very sad case, Americans’ concept of democracy – vote for a dictator.

  14. Pingback: Glacial Joe

  15. antechamp says:

    That’s the problem. A demagogue wins.

  16. disloyal boy says:

    With a president like him, will the truth about Saudi Boston bombers ever come out?

  17. Sam Lancer says:

    I do not know whether I dislike more hin or the people voting for him. He is a traitor.

  18. Pingback: hogan hollow

  19. Trouncer says:

    He’s indeed steadfast – he never stop to tell the truth.

  20. John Bull says:

    So hopeless, so stupid and so arogant – a real American.

  21. Brendan T says:

    Very dangerous fool indeed!

  22. Ged Red says:


  23. Monika says:

    I love you…

  24. Max Pascher says:

    If Romney has not compensated virtually any fees within a decade, would you assume the INTEREST RATES could have also been throughout this?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>