Feminists’ idea of debate



About Antisthenes

A Greek philosopher, a pupil of Socrates. Led a revolt, with Diogenes, against the demands of the city-state and the sophistication of life. Accepted the interrelation of knowledge, virtue, and happiness; and sought the ideal condition for happiness in return to primitivism and self-sufficiency. Rejected all social distinctions as based on convention, scorned orthodox religion as a fabrication of lies, and studied early legends and animal life in order to arrive at a true understanding of natural law. The individual was free and self-sufficient when he was master of his passions, secure in his intelligence, impervious to social or religious demands, and satisfied with the poverty of a mendicant. Needless to say, a person who on the Fog of Chaos adopted the Athenian philosopher's name has nothing whatsoever in common with him.
This entry was posted in Culture, Politics and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Feminists’ idea of debate

  1. A Klomaty says:

    Perfect image! I has to feel sorry for that wimp, but it is his own fault.

  2. Dormitor says:

    And that is a polite, reasonable victim of male oppression! But – Metro-wimp men want to be subservient anyway, so what’s the problem?

  3. emily off the list says:

    In a few years time all normal women will curse the Feministas.

  4. Frank Furt says:

    It’s men’s fault. They are not men any more.

  5. Lantern Man says:

    Why debate? Wimin are always right, and ex-men accept it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>